- Boston
01205 351114 - Bourne
01778 218001 - Grantham
01476 591550 - Horncastle
01507 522456 - Lincoln
01522 541181 - London
02078 715755 - Market Deeping
01778 341494 - Newark
01636 673731 - Sleaford
01529 411500 - Spalding
01775 725664 - Stamford
01780 764145
A significant new Court of Appeal judgment has clarified the relationship between TUPE and vicarious liability. In ABC v Huntercombe (No. 12) & others, the Court considered whether a business acquiring employees under TUPE also acquires liability for historic acts or omissions committed by those employees while working for their previous employer.
Key point
The Court of Appeal has confirmed that liability for third‑party claims arising from an employee’s pre‑transfer conduct does not transfer under TUPE.
This means that if an employee previously caused harm to a third party, for example through negligence, an accident or other alleged wrongdoing, the new employer is not responsible for those historic acts once the employee transfers.
The case
The claim involved alleged mistreatment of a hospital patient by doctors. The hospital operator sold the business, and its staff transferred to a new operator under TUPE. The original employer later went into liquidation. The claimant pursued claims against:
- the former hospital operator
- the new operator
- the doctors alleged to have been involved
The Court held that vicarious liability for the doctors’ alleged historic actions remained with the original employer, despite its insolvency. The new employer could not be held liable for acts occurring before the transfer.
Implications for employers and advisers
This judgment provides welcome certainty for organisations involved in TUPE transfers:
- No inherited third‑party liabilities Businesses acquiring staff under TUPE do not need to make provision for tortious claims arising from pre‑transfer conduct.
- Clearer due diligence scope Buyers can focus on employment‑related liabilities that do transfer, without needing to investigate historic third‑party claims.
- Litigation clarity For legal practitioners, the decision confirms who the correct defendant is in vicarious liability claims linked to pre‑transfer acts.
Subject to any appeal to the Supreme Court, this decision sets a clear boundary on the extent of TUPE liability.
Read the judgment
The full judgment is available here: https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2026/1161
Need Employment Law Advice?
If you need advice regarding this, or any other Employment Law matter, please do not hesitate to contact a member of our Employment Law Team or make an enquiry here.
